The Destructive Doctrine of Distinctives

Whether based on family and denominational traditions or biblically convinced applications and matters of conscience, everyone develops  preferences when it comes to how they practice their faith. Some utilize a more regulative principle in their decision making while others exercise a more normative principle, yet in the end they share the same result – their distinctive is their preference and as such they are not mandated by the Word of God.  It is a noteworthy peculiarity that the Scriptures do not give us a large set of rules when it comes to things such as worship style, service times, length of corporate worship, pastoral garb, nurseries, youth groups, or women’s bible fellowships not to mention small group meetings or even Sunday school for that matter.  Instead what we are given are over fifty one another commands, passages to glean principle, and historical descriptions of the primitive church.

Recently, it came back to my attention that there are some believers who have made the family a type of mini-fellowship.  In fact, they make the family its own church with the father being the pastor and this mini-body takes precedence over and above the corporate family found in the local assembly.

We’ve had such families in our church over the past decade but they don’t stay around for very long. In all of the cases we’ve seen, the parents fall victim to a myopic view of church under the label of family-integrated fellowship and become infected by a strange view of hyper-patriarchy and super-protectionism that only serves to close out relationships and cause division. This can vary by degree of course, but usually it is full-on fundamentalism with legalistic wings. Distinctive preferences becoming law.

It has been my experience that there is little that can be done for those who have been convinced of a certain distinctive practice and who have made it a doctrine. In the end, those who hold to distinctives like ‘dad must exclusively teach the children’ or ‘there can’t be instrument X in our worship service’ or ‘insert whatever non-prescribed preference here’ have no tolerance for anyone else’s view.  Their rule is dad’s rule and whether they realize it or not, they have already undermined the God-given authority of the elders in the local assembly.  This is the divisiveness of legalism that creeps into a fellowship usually through well-intentioned homeschoolers by way of teachers such as Bill Gothard and Vision Forum advocates. (For the record, we homeschool our four children and have found many good things in Vision Forum’s materials, but we find little use for Gothard’s work even if some may be able to point to a few good things in it)

Therefore I, the prisoner of the Lord, implore you to walk in a manner worthy of the calling with which you have been called, with all humility and gentleness, with patience, showing tolerance for one another in love, being diligent to preserve the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.Ephesians 4:1-3

I have yet to meet someone who makes their distinctives doctrinal that can stay within a church that doesn’t agree with their preferences. Inevitably they become separatists.  The irony is that while they claim to be family-integrated they don’t integrate their families very well outside of their cliques. (Usually because everyone who doesn’t agree with them is either ‘in sin‘ or has fallen victim to a ‘worldly church‘ or is just not as pious and holy. The exuding attitude is one of ‘you have yet to arrive in your walk with God’ hence they give the impression of spiritual arrogance) I have never in fifteen years seen them stay, talk sufficiently to the leadership about their differences, have meaningful discussions, and sharpen iron.  Instead the modus operandi is to make nice, smile, talk privately to other families in the congregation, make accusations towards the leadership, and then hit the road usually taking a few gullible folks with them.  It is not so much the content of their disagreements that creates the malady as much as it is the silence.

As a friend once said, “It is hard to address with them effectively as a minister once they have bought the entire package.” Sadly, I agree with his assessment.  The best one can do is to continue to treat them with all charity, explain the church’s position when they do speak about their differences and pray for unity.

I don’t write this to send missiles into any one camp; I write it sincerely as a minister who has seen good people get caught up in what I consider to be Pharisaical practices that certainly send out more heat than light and only serve to destroy rather than to build.  It seems that too often, we are either fabricating heart idols, handing out free-sin passes in our liberty, or inventing new regulations for our brethren to follow.  May it never be!

I pray that our hearts will be ever so wide as to embrace our diverse faith practices in obedience to our command to love one another even in our weaknesses and that we learn to live in the fullness of Christ’s charity with dignity and deference towards each man’s conscience.

Advertisements

About ostrakinos

Pastoral sojourner in the world. Raising up four daughters. Citizen of earth. Resident of heaven. Taking ten looks at Christ.

Posted on October 17, 2008, in Experiential / Application, Family Life / Parenting, Legalism, Pastoral. Bookmark the permalink. 3 Comments.

  1. The old story tells of two men who find themselves in a forest facing an angry bear. Just before they turn to run one of the men quickly changes his hiking boots for running shoes. “What are you doing?” the second man asked. “You’ll never outrun the bear just by changing shoes!” “I don’t have to outrun the bear.” said the first man. “I just have to outrun you.”

    Lifestyle standards, right doctrine, and even areas of service can be used as ways to measure success in the Christian life. The problem is that when we measure ourselves against the Lord Jesus, we always come out behind and disappointed. Success may be found, however, when we measure ourselves against others.

    If my doctrine is better, then I must be more spiritual. If my standards are higher, then I am ahead of you. If I spend more hours in service, then I feel that I am progressing. All of these work only when we measure against other people, never when we measure against Jesus.

    The downside of this type of measuring is huge. It does separate us from each other. Comparisons hurt! But many believers think they need to measure spirituality and this is the only way they know. The fun disappears when we measure ourselves against others and the others still win. Then we become discouraged and depressed.

    Why measure at all? Jesus is our Savior! He is the One who has given us life and all that we need for godliness – as a gift! The simply truth is that no believer can “out-spiritual” another because the only righteousness, the only spirituality, we have is a gift from Him. (1 Cor. 4:7)

    Thanks for a great post!

    Dave
    http://www.gracefortheheart.org

  2. This is interesting, and I am intrigued by your viewpoint since you have been on the inside of this issue. I get what you are saying, that some can take it too far…and there should be conversations between the elders and the parents…however.

    I always believed that the father is the pastor of the home, and family. That our homes should be mini-churches, and worship should not only take place just within the walls of a Church. Is that not Biblical? Shouldn’t the family be more important than the body? I mean, shouldn’t we put each other first, then the church? I think I am confused. Is it God, Church [elders], Father, Mother, Children? Should we put our church before our family? I am not sure what you are saying about that.

    I do not believe that each family should be it’s own separate entity when they are together for worship, that when they are together they should be one big family with the Pastor as “father”, Titus 2 discipleship, etc. but at home, should they not each be their own small church in and of themselves?

    Considering the way most families are today, should we not stress that fathers are responsible for the training, evangelizing and discipleship of their families, and that it is not solely the responsibility of the church, and pastor. [Deut. 6:4-9; Eph. 6:4; Eph. 5:25-27] Shouldn’t the church be equipping fathers to do just that?

    Naturally we should never forsake the gathering together of believers, but it is not possible to meet every day as they did in Acts 2. What we learn at church should be able to be carried over into our every day worship and discipleship of our families.

    Thanks,
    Karen

    • Karen, where in the Scriptures does God give the role of pastor to the father of the home? Where does the Scripture call our homes mini-churches? I understand that in principle the role of spiritual oversight overlaps – ie- a father is an overseer, a father should lead his family in prayer and song, etc. as a believer and head, but the role of pastor is a God-given role for the structure of the church Body.
      Some men are simply not qualified to teach their families. Many men have little to no discernment, should they be the ‘pastors’ of their homes? I don’t pit the family vs. the church but Scripture does certainly say that our true family is the family of God not our blood family.
      So, in that sense, no the family is not more important than the Body since the Body IS our family. Again, it depends on how one means this and in what degree etc., but I hope you understand what I mean.

      The elders are responsible for the training up of fathers to oversee their families but when the father thinks that he is now a pastor himself where does that leave the church? Surely each father being a ‘pastor’ leads to confusion in some respect as again not every man by virtue of his progeny is qualified. I had families at my church, for example, who refused to come to Sunday school because it was the job of the fathers to teach their own children. This undermines the authority and structure of God’s given means of godly education – the church. Again, it is the refusal that is the problem.

      Hopefully this helps.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: